presumptions and assumptions do not share the same definition.. but people oftentimes equate both words to be synonymous.. im not sure. it may even be that im the only person to that "people" word.. lol
after i graduated in college and earned a degree in AB Political Science, i worked in a non-voice business process outsourcing company.. though my degree is way far unconnected with the job, i managed to bear the pressure for almost two years.. in that company, we only adhere to one simple rule. NEVER ASSUME. the job is mainly on documents.. organizing, analysis and a lot of encoding (titles, authors, recipients, copyees, dates, etc..). in every project, we follow a different set of specification, from the capitalization down to the minutest details. again, in every project, its a must that we DONT ASSUME. there are never any PRESUMPTION. the issue of whether or not the specification has errors are never entertained. do what the client tells you to do, and give what the client needs. period.
when i entered law school, everything changed. the way we deal with cases is oftentimes equated with a certain PRESUMPTION that in the absence of any evidence or legal basis that may outweigh it, the presumption still stands. as matter of fact, assumptions, in a way of a proposition, may even strengthen your defense. dot dot dot? lol
am i making any sense? i dont really care. i dont even know why the hell i am writing about this stuff. lol
Posts
No comments:
Post a Comment